Drawing for SPECTRUM QUARTZ

USPTO serial 86829232

SPECTRUM QUARTZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPECTRUM QUARTZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua A. Schaul

JOSHUA A SCHAUL SHERMAN IP LLP1519 26TH STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Quartz slabs for use as countertops; Nonstructural building materials, namely, quartz slabs used in decorative surface applications for countertops and vanity topsACTIVENov 9, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 2, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 2, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 18, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 25, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 4, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 29, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 8, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 7, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance