Drawing for LUV

USPTO serial 86829746

LUV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Farming in the field of fresh produceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 4, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 18, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 12, 2017RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 12, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 1, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 20, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 19, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance