Drawing for OCTOLIFT

USPTO serial 86830839

OCTOLIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCTOLIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin D. Lee

JUSTIN D. LEE LEE HONG DEGERMAN KANG & WAIMEY660 S. FIGUEROA ST., STE. 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Ingredient to improve appearance of skin sold as an integral component of cosmetics and personal skin care products, namely, soaps, moisturizing creams, lotions, non-medicated skin serums, anti-wrinkle creams, brightening creams, skin toners, cleansing and moisturizing facial packs and masks, exfoliating skin scrubs for face and body, age spot removers, non-medicated acne spot treatment preparations, eye creams, eye make-up removers, anti-aging creams, anti-aging eye creams, anti-aging moisturizers, anti-aging lotions, non-medicated anti-aging serums, anti-aging masks, non-medicated skin preparations and masks to minimize pores, sunscreen lotions, after-sun creams and lotionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 30, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 29, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 31, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 5, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance