USPTO serial 86831121
FLUID INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLUID INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and artificial intelligence systems comprising computer hardware, computer software, communication networks, fluid sensors, valves, alarms, and controllers, all for monitoring, analyzing, and controlling fluid flow into and within infrastructure pipeline systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |