Drawing for USTOCKER

USPTO serial 86831269

USTOCKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USTOCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Blanchette

JAMES A BLANCHETTE CESARI AND MCKENNA LLP88 BLACK FALCON AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Trading in securitiesACTIVEJul 7, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 4, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 4, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2018EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Mar 19, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 12, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 24, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 23, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2017CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 11, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 21, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance