USPTO serial 86831301
ADM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2019
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ADM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WINNIPEG, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
WINNIPEG, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alison W. Jarzyna
Alison W. Jarzyna Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | 3-D printing and additive manufacturing excluding activities in the agricultural, corn processing, oil seed processing, food and feed industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, measurement, technical validation and testing of metal and polymer parts and products for use in medical and aerospace applications excluding activities in the agricultural, corn processing, oil seed processing, food and feed industries; product development and product development consulting services in the field of biomedicine, bioengineering and aerospace excluding activities in the agricultural, corn processing, oil seed processing, food and feed industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PADM GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision ADM Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision ADM Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision ADM Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 15988977 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ADM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |