USPTO serial 86832383
LOS POLLITOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOS POLLITOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy Zoubek
NANCY ZOUBEK RITHOLZ LEVY SANDERS CHIDEKEL & FIELDS235 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, 3RD FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, namely, board games, playing card and card games, action skill games; educational development skill games, namely, children's educational games for developing language, multilingual, math, counting, reading, preschool, communication, social and STEM skills; toys and playthings, namely, manipulative toys in the nature of educational toys for teaching language, multilingual, math, counting, reading, pre-school, communication, social and STEM skills to children; dolls, toy vehicles, stuffed toy animals, bath toys, mechanical action toys, baby multiple activity toys, crib toys, toy construction blocks, drawing toys, fantasy character toys, mechanical toys, and inflatable toys, action figures, toy cars, toy trains, toy musical instruments, toy kitchen appliances, toy kitchen utensils, and other toys for kids, namely, stuffed toys, plush toys, plastic and vinyl toy characters and toy animals, toy figures and collectable toy figures, bathtub toys, inflatable bath toys, construction toys, toy airplanes and helicopters, musical toys, articles of clothing for toys, dolls and doll accessories, namely, clothing for dolls, doll rooms, doll beds, doll houses, toy fabrics and linens for dolls and strollers for dolls; apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; home video game machines; hand-held video game machines, namely, hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; electronic educational game machines for children; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; hand-held game units for playing electronic games for use with external display screen or monitor; game equipment comprising board games and playing cards sold as a unit for playing board games and card games; stand-alone video output games machines; electronic amusement apparatus, namely, amusement game machines; component parts for all the aforesaid goods; sporting articles, namely, balls for games and sporting games; Christmas tree ornaments and decorations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |