USPTO serial 86832439
XSPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XSPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel,
SALLY M. ABEL, FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment, computers; computer networking hardware; computer software for network virtualization and for deploying, configuring and orchestrating applications and services and network policy management; computer hardware and software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks, data centers and telephony systems; computer servers; computer network switches; computer chassis; network extenders; network adapters; network servers; network and data storage devices, namely, computer network-attached storage (NAS) hardware; telecommunication switches, namely, Ethernet switches, data center switches and unified fabric switches; virtual switches, network access server hardware and operating software; computer operating software; computer network router, switch, hub and server operating software; network management and security software, namely, software for traffic prioritization, security, intrusion prevention, virtual private networks, firewalls, and identity and access control; computer software for network automation, optimization, management, and configuration; computer software to operate, maintain, manage and deploy cloud computing resources; computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; computer software for accessing and using cloud computing networks, for operating and maintaining computer networks and servers; computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; computer software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; all of the foregoing excluding image processors, image engines, large-scale integrated circuits for image processing, image processors for digital cameras, computer programs for large-scale integrated circuits for image processing, and digital cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of computer networking hardware, cloud computing and computer datacenter architecture; industrial analysis and research services in the field of computer networking and cloud computing technology; computer network design for others; computer consultation services; computer systems analysis and engineering services; computer hardware and software design; updating of computer software for others; technology consultation in the fields of computer networking, cloud computing, telecommunications, computer hardware, computer software, data storage, data security and virtualization technologies; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for operating and maintaining computer networks and servers and for managing network security; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software in the field of computer network communications, namely, software for use in the design, implementation and operation of cloud computing networks; computer services, namely, computer networking services in the nature of network analysis, network virtualization and integration of private and public cloud computing environments; platform-as-a-service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for managing computer networks, for developing and testing software applications, for controlling network security and access, and for implementing network security policies; software-as-a-service (SAAS) featuring business and network analytics software for managing computer networks and telecommunications networks, monitoring network performance, and collecting and analyzing network usage data and customer activity data; infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) services featuring software for managing, operating, monitoring, troubleshooting, configuring and optimizing computer networks, managing network storage and security, and deploying and installing software applications over networks; server, application and cloud hosting services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; electronic data storage; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting the software applications of others; providing information in the field of computer networking and software development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |