USPTO serial 86832791
ENVISION 3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVISION 3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Schnurr
DAVID SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 HAGEY BLVD., SUITE 300WATERLOO, N2L6R5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in image guided surgery applications; Computer software for use in planning and tracking the position of a patient and medical devices and apparatus during image guided surgery; Computer software for displaying video images for image guided surgical procedures; Computer software for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, cranial, orthopedic, spinal, soft tissue, ear, nose and throat (ENT), plastic surgery, radiosurgical and robot-assisted applications, and for three-dimensionally registering and referencing patient location data | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electro-medical apparatuses, namely, computers and display devices, calibration devices and replacement parts therefor, for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, cranial, orthopedic, spinal, soft tissue, ear, nose and throat (ENT), plastic surgery, radiosurgical and robot-assisted applications; Medical navigation systems for use in locating and tracking the position of a patient and of instruments during image guided surgery, namely, high resolution computers, cameras, monitors, docking stations, headsets, probes, sensors, instrument adaptors, markers, target positioners and cables; Image guidance systems for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, cranial, orthopedic, spinal, soft tissue, ear, nose and throat (ENT), plastic surgery, radiosurgical and robot-assisted applications, namely, system carts, each comprising a computer, mouse, keyboard, foot pedal, monitors, universal power supplies, system heads, each comprising light handles, light scanners, optical tracking systems and surgical luminaires | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services, namely, hosting computer application software for the storage of data and information for image-guided surgeries | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely, medical services in the field of image guidance surgery systems and surgical robotic navigational systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 7D Surgical Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ENVISION 3D
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |