Drawing for CT

USPTO serial 86833086

CT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip A. Kantor

PHILIP A. KANTOR LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP A. KANTOR, P.C.1781 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 120LAS VEGAS, NV 89134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and downloadable software for use in monitoring, tracking, detecting, preventing and managing fraud in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing; card readers and card scanners for credit cards and debit cardsACTIVE—
036Providing financial risk management services for credit card and debit card payment processing via a global computer networkACTIVE—
041On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and preventionACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring technology that allows users to exchange information about potential credit card and debit card fraud; on-line non-downloadable software for use in monitoring, tracking, detecting, preventing and managing fraud in the field of credit card and debit card payment processingACTIVE—
045Providing fraud detection services in the field of credit cards and debit cards; computerized fraud monitoring and detection in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing; fraud detection services in the nature of evaluation of evidence relating to fraud in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing; fraud resolution and support services in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing, namely, chargeback recovery services in the nature of representing merchants in chargeback disputes; chargeback resolution and prevention services, namely, providing merchants with legal information to avoid chargebacks and representing merchants in chargeback disputes; fraud management and risk management consultation services, namely, providing credit card and debit card security threat information and analysis to retailers by electronic means; computerized security services in the field of credit cards and debit cards, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other suspicious activity; legal consulting services in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention; providing an interactive website allowing users to exchange information about potential credit card and debit card fraud; social networking services in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention and credit card and debit card payment processing, provided via a website; membership-based fraud detection and prevention services, namely, providing members of a membership program with information on suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other suspicious activityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance