USPTO serial 86833449
SEVAEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEVAEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
ROBERT P. FELBER, JR. WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS, LLP511 UNION ST STE 2700NASHVILLE, TN 37219-1791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; insulated clothing for protection against accident or injury; reflective and illuminated clothing for safety purposes; flotation vests; life jackets; protection and safety apparatus, namely, inflatable personal flotation devices; survival suits, namely, insulated overall wet suits and dry suits | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | medical apparel, namely, caps, tops, bottoms, body suits, shoe coverings for use in medical examination and treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | foul weather gear; rain coats; rain hats, rain jackets, rain suits, rain trousers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |