USPTO serial 86834027
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · 1838· MCV RPI VCUHEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · 1838· MCV RPI VCUHEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth L Brooks
16 N. LAUREL STREETRICHMOND, VA 23284UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | continuing education services, namely, providing live and on-line continuing professional education seminars in the medical and related fields in the nature of healthcare, nursing, and allied health | ACTIVE | Aug 26, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2016 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |