Drawing for HEROQUEST CLASSIC

USPTO serial 86834134

HEROQUEST CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VIGIL, JACOB EUGENE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEROQUEST CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jenny Johnson-Sardella

JENNY JOHNSON-SARDELLA HUNTER TAUBMAN FISCHER & LI LLC255 UNIVERSITY DRCORAL GABLES, FL 33134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028(Based on Intent to Use) Board games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Gaming paper, namely, paper printed with regular grid and hexagon patterns for use in playing war games, role playing games and miniature games(Based on 44(e)) Board games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Gaming paper, namely, paper printed with regular grid and hexagon patterns for use in playing war games, role playing games and miniature gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 19, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 11, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 11, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 10, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance