USPTO serial 86835121
VAMAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2018
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with VAMAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cassano Magnago Varese, IT
Cassano Magnago Varese, IT
Cassano Magnago Varese, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeff Goehring
Jeff Goehring Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated elevating or lifting work platforms for land vehicles for moving and storing vehicles, namely, vehicle lifts; Power operated machines and machine tools for maintenance operations on land vehicles, namely, lifts for elevating vehicles, tire changers, wheel washers, and wheel lifters, all for performing maintenance operations on the wheels and undercarriage of land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Power operated machines and relative tools, namely, suspension alignment tools and systems, namely, wheel alignment measuring apparatus, namely, rolling roads and roll test stands, for performing maintenance on vehicles, namely, for regulating the alignment, toein and balance of wheels for land vehicles; Electrical and electronic equipment for monitoring, inspecting and setting land vehicles, namely, diagnostic scanners for detecting revolutions per minute of engines, lamp and headlight power, sound level, and exhaust gasses; Electronic equipment for platform brake testers and roller brake testers used to calculate the braking efforts and efficiencies of motor vehicles; Electronic equipment for platform shock absorber tester and roller/platform brakes tester used to calculate efficiency of shock absorption and brake efficiency in motor vehicles; Electronic testers for suspension tester for testing suspensions of land vehicles; Power steering and rack testers for checking steering play in land vehicles to evaluate steering wheel movement; Diagnostic scanners for testing land vehicle engines; Exhaust gas gauges and analyzers for land vehicles for measuring and analyzing oxygen and carbon monoxide and other causes caused by combustion; Stress gauges for testing equipment of land vehicles, namely, strain gauges, to evaluate resistance caused by strain; Testing and measuring equipment for use in testing the performance and efficiency of land vehicle power plant, namely, dynamometers; Testing apparatus, namely, suspension testers for testing suspension springs and shock absorbers of land vehicles; Testing apparatus, namely, speed testers for calibrating the speed sensors and gauges of land vehicles and for emissions and pollution testing; Alignment machines for inspecting and recording wheel and/or suspension geometry, namely, power operated machines and relative tools in the nature of wheel alignment testers for installation, testing and maintenance of wheels and steering wheels; Alignment machines for inspecting and recording wheel and/or suspension geometry, namely, suspension and brake installations for land vehicles; Alignment machines for inspecting and recording wheel and/or suspension geometry, namely, sideslip testers for testing sideslip angle and regulating the sideslip of land vehicles; Automotive testing equipment, namely, brake testing equipment, namely, roller brake testers and plate brake testers for testing and inspecting the efficiency of brake installations of land vehicles; Power operated wheel balancing machines, namely, electronic computerized wheel balancers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |