USPTO serial 86836045
URBAN PIE PIZZA CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URBAN PIE PIZZA CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
DANIEL E KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SC1000 N WATER STREETSUITE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen Pizza not sold or distributed through restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |