Drawing for B-FRANKLY

USPTO serial 86836722

B-FRANKLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B-FRANKLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Hanamirian, Esq.

John M. Hanamirian, Esq. Hanamirian Law Firm, PC40 E. Main StreetMoorestown, NJ 08057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Hair salon servicesACTIVEDec 2, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2020PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 31, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 23, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 18, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 26, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 26, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 26, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 22, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 22, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2018WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2018WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance