Drawing for SST SYSTEMS & SERVICES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

USPTO serial 86836830

SST SYSTEMS & SERVICES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SST SYSTEMS & SERVICES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE8TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT SERVICESACTIVE—
036DEBT RECOVERY AND COLLECTION SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 21, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 21, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance