USPTO serial 86836923
BECKTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BECKTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lauderdale, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda M. Prose
AMANDA M PROSE WESTMAN CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER PA900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTHSUITE 1400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Product development in fields other than combat systems acquisition and in-service programs, namely, in the field of consumer products and commercial goods | ACTIVE | May 23, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |