USPTO serial 86837497
ZAO ORGANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZAO ORGANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brandon D. Smith,
BRANDON D. SMITH, SCHERER SMITH & KENNY, LLP140 GEARY STREET, 7TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Compotes; Dried vegetables; Edible oils and fats; Eggs; Fish, not live; Fruit-based snack food; Jellies and jams; Meat; Meat extracts; Milk; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Poultry and game; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; Processed edible seeds; All of the foregoing goods are organic or organically derived | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; Bread and pastry; Cereal-based snack foods; Chocolate; Cocoa; Coffee; Flour; Grain-based chips; Honey and treacle; Ices and ice creams; Malt for food purposes; Mustard; Oatmeal; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Processed cereals; Processed grains; Processed oats; Ready-to-eat cereals; Rice; Rice cakes; Rice-based snack foods; Salt; Sauces; Spices and ice; Sugar; Syrup for flavoring food or beverages; Tapioca; Tea; Topping syrup; Vinegar; Yeast, baking powder; All of the foregoing goods are organic or organically derived | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Foodstuffs for animals; Fresh fruit and vegetables; Natural plants and flowers; Raw cocoa beans; Unprocessed cereals; Unprocessed edible seeds; Unprocessed grains for eating; All of the foregoing goods are organic or organically derived | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |