USPTO serial 86837975
DENROKU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENROKU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yamagata-shi, Yamagata, JP
Yamagata-shi, Yamagata, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Liane L. Churney
LIANE L. CHURNEY FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, P.C.2026 RAMBLING ROADKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bean-based snack foods; roasted peanuts; salted processed peanuts; nut-based snack foods; nut-based snack foods, namely, shelled skinless peanut snack foods prepared in butter; nut-based snack foods, namely, peanut snack foods, deep-fried peanut snack foods, spicy peanut snack foods; nut-based snack foods, namely, peanut snack foods with squid-flavored coating, peanut snack foods with seaweed-flavored coating, peanut snack foods mixed with spicy baked or fried rice crackers in the shape of persimmon seeds, peanut snack foods mixed with fish and spicy baked or fried rice crackers in the shape of persimmon seeds, peanut snack foods mixed with shrimp-flavored spicy baked or fried rice crackers in the shape of persimmon seeds; nut-based snack foods, namely, cashew snack foods, snack foods consisting of baked coconuts and almond, snack foods consisting of baked almond, snack foods consisting of fish and almond; soy-bean-based snack foods, namely, soy bean snack foods coated with Japanese horseradish, soy bean snack foods coated with soy sauce, soy bean snack foods coated with miso (soya bean paste), snack foods consisting of baked soy beans, snack foods with baked soy beans and dried seaweed; dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; vegetable-based snack foods; bean-based snack foods, namely, adzuki beans coated with powdered or ground green tea; sweet food snack made of agar jelly, namely, dried pieces of agar jelly | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Crackers; rice crackers; corn-based crackers; pellet-shaped rice crackers; rice cakes; sweet pounded rice cakes; rice-based snack foods; corn-based snack foods; cereal-based snack foods; popcorn; chocolate; spicy baked and fried rice crackers in the shape of persimmon seeds; nut-based snack foods, namely, sugar-coated peanuts, peanut snack foods flavored with coconut, chocolate-coated peanuts, peanuts coated with sugar, and sesame-flavored peanuts coated with sugar; chocolate confections, namely, chocolate-covered adzuki beans; chocolate confections, namely, chocolate-covered beans; nut-based confections, namely, almond confections and almonds covered with chocolate; corn-based crackers covered with chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |