Drawing for SOLIS

USPTO serial 86838500

SOLIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONEGAN, DANIEL P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES PLLC1001 TEXAS AVE STE 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines, namely, rotovator tillers, threshers, shellers, huskers, cultivators, disk harrows, seeders, ploughs, reapers, combine harvesters; agricultural instruments, namely, cutters in the nature of silage cutters, tree stump cutters, trench cutters; agricultural implements, namely, seed drills; hand tools, namely, electric drills; electric motors, namely, electric motors, not for land vehicles, electric motors for machines; pumping machines, namely, compressed air pumps, fuel pumps for land vehicles; diesel oil engines for machines; engine pump sets, namely, pumps for cooling engine, pumps as part of machines, motors and engines, oil pumps for use in motors and enginesACTIVENov 16, 2016
012Tractors and parts thereofACTIVENov 16, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 19, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 31, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 14, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 7, 2017AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 4, 2017AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 3, 2017EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 19, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance