USPTO serial 86839138
CORTINA BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRINGER, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORTINA BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren M. Geliebter
DARREN M. GELIEBTER LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP305 BROADWAY, 7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed mushrooms; Mushrooms puree; Dried edible mushrooms; Preserved artichokes; processed artichokes; Artichoke paste; olive oil; cooking oil; sunflower oil; soybean oil for cooking; vegetable oil; edible oil; salad oil; frozen fruits; processed fruits, namely, frozen blueberries, etc.; Frozen vegetables; vegetables, instant frozen; Vegetables, namely, indicate specific type and also indicate they are processed, e.g., frozen, canned, preserved; processed asparagus; tahini; dried lentils; coconut milk for culinary purposes; chili powder; hot chili pepper puree; processed peppers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Vinegar; balsamic vinegar; flavored vinegar; wine vinegar; cooking wine; processed quinoa; paella; rice; noodles; saffron for use as a food seasoning; sea salt for cooking; maple syrup; curry pastes; curry sauce; curry; chili sauce; chili powders; chili seasoning; pasta sauce; chili sauce; artichoke sauce; curry sauce; picante sauce; noodles, sauce and processed vegetables combined in unitary packages; dipping sauces; cooking sauces; couscous | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh mushrooms; Raw mushrooms; Unprocessed mushrooms; Fresh artichokes; Raw artichokes ; unprocessed artichokes; unprocessed quinoa; unprocessed rice; raw asparagus; unprocessed asparagus; fresh asparagus; fresh lentils; fresh peppers; raw peppers; chili peppers; unprocessed peppers | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Frozen fruit beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Food Trading Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CORTINA BRAND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |