Drawing for 5 À 7

USPTO serial 86840252

5 À 7

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DANYTHE ELIZABETH HA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 5 À 7?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessie Reider, CA Bar 237113

Jessie Reider, CA Bar 237113 Buchalter, APC1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soap, body lotions, perfume and cosmeticsACTIVE—
014Jewelry and watchesACTIVE—
018Handbags, wallets, tote bags, back packs and umbrellasACTIVE—
020Household accessories and home items, namely, pillowsACTIVE—
024Household accessories and home items, namely, bed linens, table linens, towels, shower curtainsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, lingerie, swimwear, belts; headgear, namely, hats and caps; footwearACTIVE—
035Retail services, namely, retail store services featuring general consumer merchandise and online retail store services featuring general consumer merchandiseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 10, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
May 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 8, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 14, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance