Drawing for HIP

USPTO serial 86843184

HIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Dierenfeldt-Troy

Susan Dierenfeldt-Troy TROY & SCHWARTZ, LLC9415 SW 72nd StreetSuite 119MIAMI, FL 33173-1318

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Facial skin care preparations infused with hemp, namely, makeup and eye makeup removers, facial cleansers, facial scrubs, facial masks, facial and eye serums, facial and eye moisturizing creams and lotions, toners, astringents, and lip balms infused with hemp; body and hand care preparations infused with hemp, namely, body washes and moisturizing creams and lotions; shampoo and hair conditioner preparations infused with hemp; sunscreen preparations infused with hemp; none of the foregoing derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L except for the mature stalks or sterilized seeds thereofACTIVE—
005Liquid and powder nutritive supplements for human use infused with hemp, namely, protein powders, vitamins, and chlorophyll; none of the foregoing derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L except for the mature stalks or sterilized seeds thereofACTIVE—
032Non-alcoholic beverages infused with hemp, namely, energy drinks, sports drinks, energy shots, fruit and vegetable juices, coconut water, bottled water, and flavored bottled water; none of the foregoing derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L except for the mature stalks or sterilized seeds thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2023EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 8, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 2, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 8, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 3, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 22, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 15, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 5, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2020PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 18, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance