Drawing for LEAGUE OF LEGENDS MID-SEASON INVITATIONAL

USPTO serial 86843508

LEAGUE OF LEGENDS MID-SEASON INVITATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAGUE OF LEGENDS MID-SEASON INVITATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brooke Erdos Singer

Brooke Erdos Singer Davis & Gilbert LLP1740 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, game book manuals and printed programs for video game competitions; posters; stickers; temporary tattoos; paper bannersACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, pajamas, sweatshirts, shirts, pants, jackets, shorts, socks, ties and sweaters; headwear; shoesACTIVE—
038Broadcast and streaming of video game play and video game competitions over global communication networks, the Internet, and wireless networks; providing message boards or interactive discussion forums, namely, providing on-line chatrooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among participants in and players of computer and video gamesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games for others over global and local area computer networks; Providing interactive online computer games via the Internet; Providing information about online computer games and video games via the Internet; Providing multiplayer interactive on-line computer games over the Internet; Arranging and conducting competitions for video gamers and computer game players; fan club servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 31, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 31, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance