Drawing for BRIGHT RESPONSE

USPTO serial 86845139

BRIGHT RESPONSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGHT RESPONSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward T. White

EDWARD T. WHITE LECLAIRRYAN919 EAST MAIN STREETTWENTY-FOURTH FLOORRICHMOND, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Data management services, namely, computerized database managementACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring education resources, namely, a website featuring non-downloadable software for use in analyzing and interpreting student formative assessment testing data; Providing a website featuring education resources, namely, a website featuring non-downloadable software for tracking formative educational assessment data, student progress, student intervention planning; Providing a website featuring education resources, namely, a website featuring non-downloadable software for use in data and database management in the field of education, student intervention tracking and planning and student assessment; Providing a website featuring education resources, namely, a website featuring non-downloadable software for use in monitoring, tracking and validating progress of special education and gifted student dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance