Drawing for BURNING MAN

USPTO serial 86845209

BURNING MAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURNING MAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frances M. Jagla

Frances M. Jagla Lane Powell PC601 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 2100Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003essential oils for electronic cigarette cartridgesABANDONED—
034electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin; electronic cigarettes; E-vapor devices namely smokeless cigar vaporizer pipes and smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe and oral vaporizer pipes for smokers; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; disposable and reusable cartridges sold filled with propylene glycol for electronic cigarettes; smokeless cigar vaporizer pipes; smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2016MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance