USPTO serial 86845550
Serial No. 86845550
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86845550?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan W. Bockhop
BRYAN W BOCKHOP BOCKHOP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW LLC2375 MOSSY BRANCH DRIVESNELLVILLE, GA 30078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Conducting sightseeing travel tours by bus | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |