USPTO serial 86845993
I HEHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I HEHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Schumann
MICHAEL D. SCHUMANN Hamre Schumann Mueller & Larson P C45 South Seventh Street, Suite 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of greeting cards online; transmission of digital files; providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users, providing on-line forums for users for exchange of ideas and transmission of information concerning health, education, training, entertainment matters and parent-child issues; providing access to databases; providing user access to global computer networks; providing telecommunication channels for teleshopping services; television broadcasting; wireless broadcasting; providing internet chatrooms | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing live and on-line classes, seminars, workshops in the field of agriculture, biotechnology, medicine, food supplements, chemical industry, printing, packaging and materials, namely, providing seminars in the fields of science and medicine, namely, providing parent-child education services, parent-child gardening classes, parent-child baking classes, parent-child playdough playing classes; teaching in the field of computer, music, dancing, physical fitness training, operation and management of enterprises, health activities; organization of competitions in the field of sports, calligraphy, boxing, chess, beauty, and parent-child education; arranging and conducting of educational conferences; providing on-line electronic publications, not downloadable, namely, e-books, newspapers, magazines and other sorts of literature as well as audio and video information in the field of television and theater entertainment, parent-child activities, education, technology and health; providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games from a computer network; providing on-line music, not downloadable; providing on-line videos, not downloadable featuring music, fashion, education and martial art; mobile library services; arranging and organization of parent-child activities, namely, organizing parent-child gardening classes, parent-child baking classes, parent-child playdough playing classes and parent-child DIY activities, arranging and organization of health preservation activities, namely, walking club, entertainment services in the nature of live visual and audio performances, namely, musical, dancing, magic and comedy shows; providing sports facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |