USPTO serial 86846290
ABSOPET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABSOPET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Hwa Jeong
JUN-HWA JEONG RABIN & BERDO, PC1101 14TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Intent to Use) Deodorizers for pets; Non-medicated mouth washes for pets; Pet fragrances; Pet shampoo and conditioner; Pet shampoos; Soaps for pets(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Deodorizers for pets; Non-medicated mouth washes for pets; Pet fragrances; Pet shampoo and conditioner; Pet shampoos; Soaps for pets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |