Drawing for HIMAX

USPTO serial 86846435

HIMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward A. Pennington

EDWARD A. PENNINGTON SMITH, GAMBRELL, & RUSSELL, LLP1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET, NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Carbon reinforcement fibers in the form of sheets of fully or partially impregnated material, namely, carbon fiber sheets impregnated with thermosetting or thermoplastic resins, for use in the manufacture of composite materials for aerospace, space and defense, recreation, architectural, marineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 17, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Oct 7, 2016ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance