Drawing for HIP JOYNT

USPTO serial 86846468

HIP JOYNT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIP JOYNT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda R. Conley

AMANDA R. CONLEY Brand & Branch LLP1714 Franklin Street No. 100-336Oakland, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational consulting and advisory services, namely, providing information to others about how to set up seminars and workshops in the field of business development and management, agriculture, and agricultural equipment; Providing a web site featuring non-downloadable instructional videos and tutorials in the field of health and wellnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance