USPTO serial 86846876
AGNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer D. Silverman
JENNIFER D. SILVERMAN ELLENOFF GROSSMAN & SCHOLE LLP1345 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 11TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software applications for use in accessing, searching, booking or scheduling entertainment services; computer programs for accessing, searching, booking or scheduling entertainment services; computer software, namely, computer software applications for mobile phones, computers and tablets for use in accessing, searching, booking and scheduling entertainment services; computer software, namely, computer software applications for mobile phones, computers and tablets for linking musical entertainers and performers with potential purchasers of those services | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Matching musical entertainers and performers with potential purchasers of those services by means of computer software applications on mobile phones, computers and tablets | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Booking of entertainment services in the nature of live performances by musical bands, Disc Jockeys (DJ), or singers; coordination and scheduling of bookings by event organizers for entertainment services provided by musical bands, disc jockeys (DJs), or singers; coordination of the rental of musical equipment used in live entertainment services provided by musical bands, disc jockeys (DJ), or singers; coordinating, scheduling and booking of entertainment in the nature of live performances by musical bands, disc jockeys (DJs), or singers, on behalf of others; providing coordination, scheduling and booking services in the field of entertainment in the nature of live performances by musical bands, disc jockeys (DJs), or singers, facilitated via internet, mobile phones, computers and computer tablets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |