USPTO serial 86847246
PROPRIOTOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPRIOTOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Palomar Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
pamela showalter
PAMELA SHOWALTER Aerendir Mobile Inc2570 El Camino Real, Ste 310PAMSFAWCO@GMAIL.COMMountain View, CA 94040Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for mobile and non-mobile applications for providing user authentification and identification based on technology using data from the nervous system, the neuro-muscular or the neuro-musculo-skeletal systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and software applications for providing user authentification and identification using data from the nervous system, the neuro-muscular or the neuro-musculo-skeletal systems for mobile and non-mobile applications; technological consultation in the field of using data from the nervous system, the neuro-muscular or the neuro-musculo-skeletal systems for mobile and non-mobile computer software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 31, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |