Drawing for EPIC WAR

USPTO serial 86848113

EPIC WAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPIC WAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold Milstein

HAROLD MILSTEIN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP379 LYTTON AVENUEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable video game software for use on wireless devices; computer game software downloadable from a global computer networkABANDONED—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer gamesABANDONED—
042Computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to participate in competitions, showcase their skills, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking, and improve their talent; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software tools for use in tracking performance of computer gamesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2016LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 28, 2016LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Mar 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance