Drawing for DESIGNTHINK

USPTO serial 86848326

DESIGNTHINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGNTHINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachelle A. Dubow,

RACHELLE A. DUBOW, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE FEDERAL STREETBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting forums, events, seminars, conferences and symposiums in the field of architectural design; online journals, namely, blogs and non-downloadable publications in the field of architectural designACTIVE—
042Architectural design services; graphic design services; interior design consultation services and product development servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 24, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 15, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 6, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance