Drawing for DANI & NICO

USPTO serial 86848338

DANI & NICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANI & NICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly M. Weiner

KELLY M. WEINER LAW OFFICE OF KELLY WEINER PLLC175 VARICK STREET, FL 6NEW YORK, NY 10014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring furnishings, decor, artwork, home accents, textiles, jewelry, accessories, shoes, clothing, household goods, personal care products, consumer goods of others; retail store services featuring furnishings, decor, artwork, home accents, textiles, jewelry, shoes, clothing, household goods, personal care products, consumer goods of others; advertising services, namely, promoting the brands, goods and services of others; promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping site with links to the retail web sites of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 18, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 11, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 11, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 7, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance