Drawing for POKERMATIC

USPTO serial 86848421

POKERMATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEN, ELIZABETH S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POKERMATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan Gile

RYAN GILE WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.7251 WEST LAKE MEAD BLVD., SUITE 530LAS VEGAS, NV 89128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for computers, mobile phones, smartphones, portable media players, handheld computers, and tablets, namely, software for playing online wagering and non-wagering games; Computer game software for use on computers, mobile phones, smartphones, portable media players, handheld computers, and tablets; Computer software and firmware for playing games of chance on any computerized platform; Downloadable electronic game programs, namely, play-for-fun and real money games available via the Internet, a computer network, handheld and mobile electronic devices; Downloadable software for playing casino games, games of chance, slot machines, gaming machines, online wagering games and online electronic games; Bonus games and feature games, namely, computer game software for use on games of chance played on gaming machinesACTIVE—
028Gaming machines; Machines for playing games of chance; Dice games; Board gamesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a website for internet gaming and on-line gambling that features cash wagering, non-cash wagering play for fun, and play for virtual credits; Providing on-line computer games that can be used on computers, mobile phones, smartphones, portable media players, handheld computers, and tablets; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games accessible by means of computer networks, wireless networks, mobile phone applications, and web-based applications; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games featuring play-for-fun and real money games available via the Internet, a computer network, and handheld and mobile electronic devices; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet, a computer network, and handheld and mobile electronic devices; Entertainment services, namely, providing live games of chance in gaming establishments and casinosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance