USPTO serial 86849032
SANLIGANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANLIGANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bean curd; Cooked vegetables; Dried vegetables; Fermented bamboo shoots boiled and preserved in salt (menma); Frozen bamboo shoots; Laver; Preparations for making soup; Preserved fruits; Preserved truffles; Preserved vegetables; Processed mushrooms; Soup concentrates; Tinned fish; Tinned fruits; Tinned meat; Tinned vegetables; Vegetable juices for cooking; Freeze-dried vegetables; Fruit-based snack food | ABANDONED | Oct 5, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | โ |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | โ |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Jul 24, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 24, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 19, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | โ |
| Dec 16, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | โ |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Dec 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| May 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| May 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| May 31, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | โ |
| Mar 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Dec 22, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |