USPTO serial 86849229
PAYCONCIERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAYCONCIERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Coleman Watson
COLEMAN WATSON CPLS, P.A.201 E. PINE STREET SUITE 445ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Bill payment services; Bill payment services provided through a website; Clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; Crowdfunding services in the nature of accepting and administering monetary contributions from a group of individuals; Electronic check acceptance services; Electronic credit card transactions; Electronic debit transactions; Electronic funds transfer; Electronic funds transfer by telecommunications; Electronic transfers of money; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing financial risk management services for electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network; Providing an internet website portal in the field of financial transaction and payment processing services; Financial services, namely, providing electronic transfer of a virtual currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting an interactive web site that allows electronic invoicing and payment processing through interactive voice response ( IVR); Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the purpose of payment processing; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows payment processing through electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP); Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for payment processing; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for electronic invoicing and payment processing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for payment processing; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in payment processing and electronic invoicing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |