USPTO serial 86849333
PIVOTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIVOTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENUE 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Electronic payment terminals, namely, computer hardware for use in making payments by magnetically encoded cards, integrated circuit cards or chip cards and Near Field Communications cards, credit cards and debit cards; computer terminals; downloadable mobile application for processing transactions made by magnetically encoded cards, integrated circuit cards or chip cards and Near Field Communications cards, credit cards and debit cards; software to which payment applications or other software of Independent Software Vendors can be integrated in order to send financial transactions from a payment terminals for processing; software used for electronic payments, namely, countertop or wireless payment terminals, virtual terminals, global acquiring network, mobile application, online payment and, mail or telephone orders | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Printed publications in the nature of training and operational manuals regarding electronic payment terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Electronic payment reconciliation of accounts on behalf of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Electronic payment services, namely, electronic processing of payment data; electronic processing of bill payment data; loyalty program payment processing services; charitable fundraising; charitable foundation services, namely, providing financial assistance for programs and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Technical support in the nature of technical advice related to the installation of point-of-sale terminals and card readers; installation and maintenance of payment terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Telecommunications gateway services, namely, payment gateway services; electronic payment services, namely, transmission of payment data; electronic transmission of bill payment data | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Educational services, namely, providing training services related to the implementation, integration, operation, customization and administration of electronic payment software and payment terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Design and development of computer software for electronic payments, namely, countertop or wireless payment terminal, virtual terminal, global acquiring network, mobile application, online payments and mail or telephone orders; deployment, installation, maintenance and repair of electronic payment software and payment terminals software; technical support in the nature of troubleshooting of computer software problems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software for the owners or providers of payment terminals; Technical support services, namely, the troubleshooting in the nature of providing hardware and software support services for the owners or providers of payment terminals to be used for account management and business administration of consumer loyalty programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | (Based on Intent to Use) Dispute resolution services, namely, electronic payment chargeback dispute resolution services in the event of fraud, errors authorization issues and product or service non-fulfillment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pivotal Payments Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Pivotal Payments Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PIVOTAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |