USPTO serial 86849413
GUILTY OF EVERYTHING GOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUILTY OF EVERYTHING GOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
Theodore R. Remaklus WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE STREET2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective cases and skins for mobile phones, smartphones and tablet computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Pacifiers for babies; baby bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Baby strollers; Children's car seats | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Pens; Pencils; Markers; Adhesive note pads; Notebooks; Notepads | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks; Waist packs; Tote bags; Carry-all bags; Diaper bags; Bags for carrying babies' accessories; Baby carriers worn on the body; Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Mugs; Drinking cups for babies and children | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bottoms; Jeans; Bibs not of paper; Sleepwear; Swimwear; Socks; Gloves; Mittens; Footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Skateboard; Surfboards; Balls for sports; Baseball bats; Stuffed and plush toys; Stuffed dolls and animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mathis Ventures LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mathis Ventures LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GUILTY OF EVERYTHING GOE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |