USPTO serial 86850629
HA BLUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEDNARZ, DUSTIN THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HA BLUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | beauty creams for body care; body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetic creams for skin care; cosmetic preparations for body care; cosmetic preparations for protecting the skin from the sun's rays; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; cosmetic preparations, namely, skin balsams; cosmetic skin fresheners; hair care creams; hair care lotions; lotions for face and body care; moisturizing preparations for the skin; moisturizing solutions for the skin; non-medicated skin care creams and lotions; non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; non-medicated skin toners; non-medicated sun care preparations; skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; skin cleansers; skin cleansing lotion; skin conditioners; skin cream; skin emollients; skin lighteners; skin lightening creams; skin lotion; skin masks; skin moisturizer; skin moisturizer masks; skin moisturizing gel; skin soap; skin texturizers; skin toners; skin whitening creams; skin whitening preparations; soaps for body care; sun care lotions; topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; wipes impregnated with a skin cleanser; wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |