Drawing for PIPV CAPITAL

USPTO serial 86850900

PIPV CAPITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPV CAPITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clarissa Marischen

CLARISSA MARISCHEN ANDREWS KURTH LLP111 CONGRESS AVESTE 1700AUSTIN, TX 78701-4069

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation in the field of managing and/or commercializing intellectual property assets; marketing consultation, namely, providing assistance in product commercializationACTIVE—
036Management of private equity funds; Private equity consultant services; Private equity fund investment services; Private placements of hedge funds, private equity funds, securities and derivatives for others; and Providing venture capital, development capital, private equity and investment fundingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance