USPTO serial 86852106
BREATHLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2018
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with BREATHLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Ridgefield, CT
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Ridgefield, CT
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Ridgefield, CT
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
Scott J. Major MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BREATHLESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |