USPTO serial 86852485
RACK STUDS THE SMART RACK MOUNTING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RACK STUDS THE SMART RACK MOUNTING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Auckland 2013, NZ
Auckland 2013, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston
LAURA J WINSTON KIM WINSTON LLP73 MARKET STREETSUITE 376YONKERS, NY 10710Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Racks and mountings specifically adapted for use with scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking in the nature of supervision, electronic home security, electronic office security, namely, racks and mountings specifically adapted for use with audio, visual, computer and/or telecommunications equipment, namely, audio amplifiers, audio mixers, audio/visual special effects units, graphic equalizers, electronic video signal switchers, digital media streaming devices, computer network servers, Computer network attached storage hardware, uninterruptable power supplies, computer network switches, shelves especially adapted for mounting computer network hardware, network server rack patch panels, network server rack blank plates and cable management trays; racks especially adapted to house electric cables, communications cables, surveillance apparatus in the nature of networks surveillance recorders (NVR/DVR) and/or electronic mail servers in the nature of rack mount server or rack mount virtual machine; fasteners specifically adapted for use with the aforementioned racks and mountings; fasteners specifically adapted for use with audio, visual, computer and/or telecommunications equipment, namely, audio amplifiers, audio mixers, audio/visual special effects units, graphic equalizers, electronic video signal switchers, digital media streaming devices, computer network servers, Computer network attached storage hardware, uninterruptable power supplies, computer network switches, shelves especially adapted for mounting computer network hardware, network server rack patch panels, network server rack blank plates and cable management trays; fasteners specifically adapted for use with electric cables, communications cables, surveillance apparatus in the nature of networks surveillance recorders (NVR/DVR) and/or electronic mail servers in the nature of rack mount server or rack mount virtual machine; parts, fittings and accessories for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | Apr 21, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |