USPTO serial 86852822
IDEA IQ QUICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDEA IQ QUICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jaye G. Heybl
JAYE G. HEYBL KOPPEL, PATRICK, HEYBL & PHILPOTT2815 TOWNSGATE ROAD, SUITE 215WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen appetizers consisting primarily of sausages, ham, meat, fish, poultry, cheese, or vegetables; ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of sausages, ham, meat, fish, poultry, cheese, or vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; sausage-based snack foods; ham-based snack foods; fish-based snack foods; cheese-based snack foods; vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Puff pastry pizzas; frozen savory puff pastry tarts consisting primarily of sausages, ham, meat, fish, poultry, cheese, or vegetables; frozen savoury puff pastry pies consisting primarily of sausages, ham, meat, fish, poultry, cheese, or vegetables; frozen puff pastry pies; frozen savoury puff pastry pies; frozen puff pastry tarts; frozen savoury puff pastry tarts; frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; dough enrobed foods, namely, puff pastry envelopes with fillings consisting primarily of sausages, ham, meat, fish, poultry, cheese, or vegetables; dough enrobed foods, namely, puff pastry envelopes with fillings consisting primarily of hazelnut and cocoa cream or cream; apple strudel; cakes; puff pastry rolls; pastry, namely, vol-au-vent; crust pastry; filo pastry; kataifi pastry; puff pastry; shortcrust pastry; pastries; savoury pastries; pizzas; prepared pizzas; pizza crust; pizza dough; pizza bases; flour preparations for preparing cakes and pizzas; brioches; pre-risen croissants; croissants; tarts; pies; savoury biscuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |