USPTO serial 86853549
Serial No. 86853549
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 86853549?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
College Point, NY
College Point, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Feigin
MICHAEL J FEIGIN FEIGIN AND FRIDMAN LLC1037 ROUTE 46 STE 107CLIFTON, NJ 07013-7401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus and devices, namely, computers and computer peripherals; Accessories for the electronic devices, namely, laptop case, keypads for use with computers, screen protectors comprised of acrylic, tempered glass, and plastic adapted for use with portable electronic devices, computer stylus pens; camera case and support, cellular phone case and stand, tablet computer case and stand, tablet computer sleeve, case for cameras, electronic accessories in the nature of headphones, and photographic equipment in the nature of cameras; carrying cases for cell phones, tablet computers and laptops; holders, protective cases and stands for cell phones; notebook computer carrying cases, sleeves especially adapted for holding laptops and notebook computers, notebook computer cooling pads. earphone accessories, namely, earphone cushions, earphone pads, cord management systems, earphone cases, and earphone extension cords; electronic cables, namely data cables in the nature of connecting electrical cables, cables and fibers for the transmission of sounds and images; electronic calculators; electronic card readers; electronic computers; electronic controllers for consumer electronic devices, namely, TV, electronic mobile devices; earphones, headphones, Audio equipment in the nature of audio amplifiers, audio recorders, audio speakers; optical lens; USB Device adapter in the nature of USB cables, USB hubs and switches, converters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |