USPTO serial 86853802
ENVIRO-RELEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIRO-RELEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products, namely, release agents for forms for concrete | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |