Drawing for STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER

USPTO serial 86854717

STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sven W. Hanson

SVEN W HANSON SVEN W HANSON ATTYPO BOX 357429GAINESVILLE, FL 32635UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fundraisingACTIVENov 30, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 20, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 14, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 27, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 7, 2016GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 7, 2016GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 7, 2016CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 6, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 6, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance